CÍMLAP
|
CONTENTS, PREFACE |
Contents
Preface
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Grammatical Foundations: Words
1. Language, Grammar and Linguistic Theory
2. Word Categories
2.1 The Lexicon
2.2 Categories
2.3 Morphological criteria for determining category
2.4 Distribution
3 A Typology of Word Categories
3.1 Categorial features
3.2 Predicates and arguments
3.3 Grammatical aspects of meaning
3.4 The Thematic categories
3.5 Functional Categories
3.6 Functionally underspecified categories
Check Questions
Test your knowledge
Chapter 2. Grammatical Foundations: Structure
1. Structure
1.1 The building blocks of sentences
1.2 Phrases
1.3 Sentences within phrases
1.4 Structural positions
1.5 Structural terminology
1.6 Labels
1.7 Rules
2. Grammatical Functions
2.1 The subject
2.2 The object
2.3 Indirect object
3. Testing for Structure
3.1 Substitution
3.2 Movement
3.3 Coordination
3.4 Single-word phrases
Check Questions
Test your knowledge
Chapter 3. Basic Concepts of Syntactic Theory
1. X-bar Theory
1.1 Rewrite rules and some terminology
1.2 Endocentricity
1.3 Heads and Complements
1.4 Specifiers
1.5 Adjuncts
1.6 Summary
2. Theoretical Aspects of Movement
2.1 Move α
2.2 D-structure and S-structure
2.3 Traces
2.4 Locality Restrictions on movement
3. Conclusion
Check Questions
Test your knowledge
Chapter 4. The Determiner Phrase
1. Why the Noun is not the Head of the DP
2. The Internal Structure of the DP
2.1 Determiners and Complements
2.2 The Specifier of the DP
2.3 Adjunction within the DP
3. Multiple Determiners
4. Conclusion
Check Questions
Test your knowledge
Chapter 5 Verb Phrases
1. Event Structure and Aspect
2. Verb Types
2.1 Unaccusative verbs
2.2 Light verbs
2.3 Ergative verbs
2.4 Transitive verbs
2.5 Intransitive verbs
2.6 Multiple complement verbs
2.7 Phrasal verbs
2.8 Verbs with clausal complements
2.9 Summary
3. Aspectual Auxiliary Verbs
3.1 The auxiliary as a dummy
3.2 The nature of the aspectual morpheme
4. Adverbs, PPs and Clausal modifiers
4.1 Adverbs
4.2 PP modifiers
4.3 Clausal modifiers
5. Conclusion
Check Questions
Test your knowledge
Chapter 6 Inflectional Phrases
1. The structure of IP
2. The syntax of inflection
2.1 Inserting auxiliaries into I
2.2 Do-insertion
2.3 Tense and Agreement
2.4 Movement to tense and I
3. Movement to Spec IP
4. Adjunction within IP
5. Conclusion
Check Questions
Test your knowledge
Chapter 7 Complementiser Phrases
1. The structure of CP
2. The Clause as CP
3. Interrogative CPs
3.1 Basic positions within the CP
3.2 Wh-movement
3.3 Inversion
3.4 The interaction between wh-movement and inversion
3.5 Subject questions
4. Relative Clauses
4.1 The position of the relative clause inside the NP
4.2 A comparison between relative and interrogative clauses
5. Other fronting movements
5.1 Topicalisation
5.2 Focus fronting
5.3 Negative fronting
6. Conclusion
Check Questions
Test your knowledge
Chapter 8 The Syntax of Non-Finite Clauses
1. Exceptional and Small Clauses
1.1 Clauses without CP
1.2 Clauses without IP
2. Raising and Control
2.1 Raising
2.2 Control
3. The Gerund
4. Conclusion
Check questions
Test your knowledge
Suggested Answers and Hints
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
Preface
Linguists, it has to be admitted, are strange animals. They get very
excited about things that the rest of the species seem almost blind to and
fail to see what all the fuss is about. This wouldn't be so bad if
linguists were an isolated group. But they are not, and what's more they
have to teach non-linguists about their subject. One mistake that linguists
often make is to assume that to teach linguistics, students should be
instilled with the kind of enthusiasm for the subject that linguists
themselves have. But not everybody wants to be a linguist and, as a friend
of mine once said, not everybody can be a linguist.
What the dedicated language student wants, however, is not the ability to
analyse complex data from languages in exotic regions of the world, or to
produce coherent theories that explain why you can't say his being running
in a more elegant way than anyone else can. What they want from linguistics
is to see what the subject can offer them in coming to some understanding
of how the language that they are studying works. It is for these students
that this book has been written.
This is not to say that this is not a linguistics text. It is, and
linguistics permeates every single page. But the difference is that it is
not trying to tell you how to become a linguist - and what things to get
excited about - but what linguistic theory has to offer for the
understanding of the English language. Many introductory text books in
syntax use language data as a way of justifying the theory, so what they
are about is the linguistic theory rather than the language data itself. A
book which was about language would do things differently; it would use the
theory to justify a certain view of the language under study. We have
attempted to write such a book.
As part consequence of this, we have adopted a number of strategies. The
first is what we call the 'No U-turn' strategy. If you have ever read an
introductory book on a linguistic topic you may have found pages and pages
of long and complicated arguments as to why a certain phenomena must be
analysed in such and such a way, only to find in the next chapter that
there is actually a better way of doing things by making certain other
assumptions. This is the sort of thing that linguist find fun. But students
often find it confusing and frustrating. So we have attempted to write this
book without using this strategy. As far as possible, concepts and analyses
that are introduced at some point in the book are not altered at some later
point in the book. Obviously, pictures have to be painted a bit at a time
to make them understandable and so it isn't possible to 'tell the whole
truth' right from the start. But an attempt has been made to build up the
picture piece by piece, without having to go back and rub out earlier parts
of the sketch.
Another strategy adopted in the book is to avoid unnecessary formalisms.
These are very useful if you want to understand the workings of a theory to
the extent needed to see where its weaknesses are and how it needs to be
developed to overcome these. But as this is not our aim, it is not
necessary to make students fully aware of how to formalise grammatical
principles. All they need is an understanding of how the principles work
and what they predict about the language and this can be put over in a less
formal way.
The target audience for the book is BA students, covering the introductory
syntax level and going through to more advanced BA level material. For this
reason, the book starts from the beginning and tries to make as few
assumptions as possible about linguistic notions. The first two chapters
are a fairly substantial introduction to grammatical concepts both from a
descriptive and a theoretical point of view. This material alone, along
with the exercises, could form the basis of an introduction to a syntax
course. The latter chapters then address specific aspects of the English
language and how the concepts and grammatical mechanisms introduced in the
first two chapters can be applied to these to enable an understanding of
why they are as they are. As the book relies on a 'building' process,
starting out at basic concepts and adding to these to enable the adequate
description of some quite complex and subtle phenomena, we have also
provided an extensive glossary, so that if you happen to forget a concept
that was introduced in one part of the book and made use of in another,
then it is easy to keep yourself reminded as you read.
Obviously, another feature that we hope is more student-friendly is the
exercises, of which we have a substantial amount. These range in type and
level, from those which you can use to check your understanding of the
text, to those which get you to think about things which follow from the
text, but which are not necessarily discussed there. Some are easy and some
will make you think. A fairly unique aspect of the book is that it also
provides model answers to the exercises so that you can check to see
whether you were on the right track with your answer and also for you to
learn from: making mistakes is one of the best ways to learn. But if you
never know what mistakes you made, you can't learn from them. Obviously,
the best way to use the exercises and model answers is to have a go at the
exercises by yourself first and then go and read the model answers. While
you may be able to learn something by reading the model answers without
having a go at the exercises, it is doubtful that you will get as much out
of them.
...