Tétel adatlapja
CÍMLAP
Tóth Alfréd
The common Mesopotamian substrate of Hungarian and Basque

CONTENTS, INTRODUCTION



Contents

Publisher's preface
1. Introduction
2. Etymological Dictionary
3. Conclusions
4. Bibliography
About the author



Introduction

There have been, are and without doubt still will be many attempts to "prove" the genetic affiliation of Basque and almost any other language family. I would like to mention only a few of the most known comparisons:

  • Basque and Caucasian: Bengtson (1999); Urreiztieta-Rivera (1980)
  • Basque and Semitic: Drake (1907)
  • Basque and Greek (and thus Indo-European): Otárolo (1976); Elderkin (1958)
  • Basque and Etruscan: Esandi (1946)
  • Basque resp. "Vacsonic" (i.e. Proto-Basque) and Ligurian: Vennemann (2003),
  • Noel Aziz (2001), Hamel (2007)

    Other attempts concern Basque and Dravidian, Altaic, Tibeto-Burman, Austro-Asiatic and Bantu. While Basque is not yet strongly considered to be a part of the Nostratic macrofamily, it is considered to be a member of the Na-Dene macrofamily (Greenberg 1987) - and by linguists attempting to combine Nostratic and Na-Dene to a super-macrofamily. The only attempt ever made to connect Basque and the Uralic language family was made by the French Count (Charles-Félix) Hyacinthe de Charencey (1832-1916), cf. de Charencey (1862), who got most famous as founder of Mayan linguistics (cf. Betancourt 1996). Finally, in an Internet publication, T. Majláth presented several hundreds of alleged Basque-Hungarian cognates, most of which a clearly wrong. Nevertheless, I have carefully looked through Majláth's list and picked out all these Basque-Hungarian cognates that are at least not excluded from the beginning. In addition, I used the standard Basque dictionaries of Löpelmann (1968) and Aulestia (1992) and the standard Basque grammar of Hualde-Ortiz and Urbina (2003). As best first introduction into the Basque language there are still the pioneer works of Schuchardt (1923) and Tovar (1957) to recommend.


    ×